I realize that's a strong headline, but I want to make sure I am clear about this.
The Kodak EasyShare v705 is, without question, the best POINT AND SHOOT camera for the Real Estate Professional I've ever come across. I have searched high and low to find a camera I could feel comfortable personally recommending. This is it.
The two images below were taken with the settings right out of the box. I did not turn on any lights or open any drapes. I just used the basic settings, pointed the camera at the room and clicked. For the photo on the left, I used the standard 35mm lens, the one found on most point and shoot cameras. Then I took the photo on the right, two seconds later, from the exact same spot, in the exact same lighting. Only the photo on the right uses the v705's default "ultra wide angle lens."
You'll notice that the photo on the left is probably a lot like photos you might expect from a standard, 35mm point and shoot digital camera. Even though this is a large room, it doesn't feel large in the photo. The lighting is also poor, though not as bad as it could have been. It is certainly typical of amateur interior photos.
The photo on the right is a dramatic improvement. The ultra wide lens captures more light, so the room is significantly brighter (again, this was shot in the exact same lighting conditions). The room also feels substantially larger. There is no question in my mind. If you buy this camera, you will take better photos right out of the box. As a result, the homes you sell will look better in your marketing materials and your Real Estate Shows will be more powerful.
Here is another set of examples. This time from the curb. There were cars in front of this house, as is often the case, so I couldn't go across the street to get a better shot of the front. I'm sure you've been in that situation. Notice the improvement.
This camera also allows you to create panoramic shots with an ease I've never experienced.
Three shots creates a 180 degree view of a scene and all of the alignment and stitching happens right in the camera. The following was my first attempt. I was so amazed at how simple it looked, I rushed out to sit on the love seat with my wife and forced her to watch me do it. So she was leaning up against me as I did, shaking the camera. You can see my feet in the photo (sorry). I could have done another shot, but I wanted to show you the very first attempt! It was even simpler than I thought it would be.
For $299, you are simply not going to find a better camera. So, do yourself a favor. Sell your old digital camera on eBay and take my advice. Buy this camera.
Jeff Turner aka respres





Here's some info on the V705 from dPreview
Wow! It's a sexy-lookin' little thing!!
I think I just might grab one to to keep tucked in my bag at all times!!
Thanks Jeff,
I have an Olympus 5060WZ (wide zoom) which in low light and set at the widest angle will seem darker than I like. I'll have to check this out.
Thanks Jay
As I said in my post. It took a lot for me to endorse a camera. That's the reason why I took the photos above without touching the settings on the camera at all. My living room is not super dark, but it's not bright with the curtains drawn. As you can see, the 35mm lens was as you'd expect, darker than you want. But the ultra wide angle captured more light.
I've used the camera for several weeks now and playing with the multitude of automatic settings can get you a pretty good photo is just about any light. When I need a great portrait of one of my kids, I pull out the Canon Digital Rebel. But this one is so small and light, that I do carry it with me everywhere. I'm very pleased.
Jeff, the Kodak EasyShare P880 rocks too .. for $269 online at Costco (the price has gone down again!) after the $100 rebate. It has the ability to do video and all kinds of stuff.
Make sure to check them both out before investing.
Maureen if you have the time, like panoramas, and want to do them yourself you can. Contact Real Tour Vision. Tell 'em I sent you! :) (it doesn't cost you anything.. just gets me a pat on the back ;)
Dawn Shaffer
Cheryl, yes there is some shutter lag, and that's a tradeoff, but in this case it's not a severely noticeable tradeoff. For me, shutter lag has always been part of the learning curve with a point and shoot camera. It's just something you get used to.
With the v705 I have not noticed the shutter lag like I did with the Sanyo VPC-C6, which was my last most recent point and shoot camera. For me, the convenience of being able to stick the camera in my pocket is worth the small shutter lag.
Thanks Jeff,
A wide angle point and shoot camera is tough to find. I had to get a Ricoh Caplio R1 from Japan a couple of years ago. You definitely need it to get decent interior pictures. I'll have to donate my current camera to my wife and try this one out.
Jeff, thanks for the input--I will continue to use my Olympus C7070 wide lens for the tight shots.
Dawn Shaffer
Ok Jeff, I thought your title was bold.. but I must agree with your post. most of my pics for appraising cause me to find that special angle from the corner of the back yard to get the rear photo. this is nice, and my old dig is starting to act a little crazy.
plus the panoramic would have been nice on my recent trip.. so I guess you just gave me another excuse to make a similar trip or even revisit some of the nicer spots.
so, thanks to this post I will be able produce better appraisal reports. much appreciated. I hope santa knows that I have been nice.. or at least more nice that naughty!
take care,
nick
Further to Jeff's recommendation, Pop Photo says this.
Overall, for the price and feature set, the EasyShare V705 is a well-mannered camera that has some useful and interesting features. The V705 has the rock-solid feel of a much more expensive camera, but at a fraction of the price, and the super-wide angle abilities place the V705 head and shoulders above most of its competition. Throw in the video editing, panoramic features, overall good performance, and good image quality, and you've got a winner.
Full review here
Just one tip -- If you are the type of photographer that likes to hold the camera up to your eye and look through the viewfinder to compose a shot, the V705 may not be the camera for you; it does not have a viewfinder.
You hold the camera away from your eye, and watch the LCD panel to compose your shot. This is the way most people use small digi-cams anyway, but for the diehards who prefer to hold the camera up to their eye, it might be a good idea to try this model out in a local camera store to see if it feels right to you....
thanks to Norm for the link to the review. I read some more reviews, but if I may pick Jeff's brain..
Since you actually have the camera Jeff, a few questions to you if you dont mind.... how is the battery life? how many shots per battery charge? and what type of batteries does it use?(found this.. Kodak Li-ion battery KLIC-7001) How long to start up and shoot (from off to on and ready)? Does the video have audio?
My little Nikon coolpics 4300 has been my little powerhouse for a while. The power up time is quick, which is great when shooting comparables in a not so nice neighborhood.. turn it on quick, get the shot and get outta there!! (people always seems to give me the 'stink eye' when I'm taking pics of their new home). :)
nick
PS. just wanted to add. I just bought 3 new rechargeable Li-ion batteries for my Nikon with a 100v/12v adapter charger for a grand total of $22 incl. shipping from http://www.power101.com/ . The batts were like $6 each with shipping, vs. $35 at best buy. They work just fine. I'm not affliated with that company, just an FYI. Order was sent same day and arrived quickly.
Nick, happy to assist. And Cheryl, thank you for the advice on the viewfinder!
First, the start up time is very quick. Less than one second to shoot ready. Second, the video is 640x480 30 fps XVGA quality with sound. I am very pleased with the video quality for family events, and you can use the zoom during video shooting. I use a 2 gig memory card, so I could shoot 80 minutes straight of video. Lastly, shots per charge is something I've not monitored. I shoot photos and video combined most of the time, so it's hard for me to say.
I am pleased with the battery life, however. My last point and shoot, which I still have, was a Sanyo VPC-C6. It's battery life was horrid. I bought it specifically because of the supposed video quality. But the video quality on this Kodak is better, the second ultra wide lens rocks and the photo quality is better as well. I'll post a video here in a bit, if I remember!
Hopes this helps a bit.
thanks for the info Jeff. I didn't know that there wasn't a limitation on video in seconds..my camera has a 40 sec limitation. By what you say, the video records as long as there is memory on the card. cooool.
nick
OK, so here is some unedited, uncompressed sample video for anyone who is interested. It saves in .mov format, so you may need the quicktime plugin to view it. It's also 12 megabytes, so be patient.
View the Kodak v705 Raw Video Here
pretty nice. love the area. here in FL everything is flat. that hilly setup is nice.
anyway.. i like the vid quality. for that size to be encoded at about 515Kb /sec is not bad.
I see some difference in the tone towards the end of the vid, as in vertical discoloration. is that a reflection? or does that happen in all the vids.
thanks for taking the time.
nick
Nick, that was a result of where I was standing in relation to the sun in that video. It is not usually there.
Mike, thanks for the low price tip!
Suzi, I have it with me now on my trip to New York. I love this camera. And here's a perfect example of why I love it. I went out an walked around the city last night. My hotel is right near Macy's. There is NO WAY I would have gotten the whole window in with a normal point and shoot. No way.
This photo was taken at night using the "museum" setting that turns off the flash and shutter sound. As with any camera, you'll get better results once you understand what circumstances to use which setting with, and a tripod will help make sure your shots are steady. Mike Whitman sent me a few comparison shots between between a Canon and the Kodak. You can see a light difference in the pixels at a one to one ratio and the Canon is slightly sharper, but as you can see from the samples he sent the ultra wide angle lens gives you a wider field of view, even at a distance.
I do not think you will regret it! Let me know your opinions post purchase, please.
I'm glad you linked to this post, I missed it the first time around.
I will be purchasing this camera, thanks for the tip
I've been using the P880 for the past 7 months, as a replacement for my canon SLR that took a 4 story trip to the pavement (long story, no insurance, very pissed :)
I’ve been extremely happy with the performance and the ability to use my hot shoe flash. The 24mm lens is clear and bright. Vingeting is minimal just don’t use the lens shade!
I’ve updated the firmware and the auto focus is more than sufficient for RE Work. My only real gripe is no cable release as I shoot at night a lot. Battery life is not bad as I shot about 200+ shots a day and that is the top end. I carry a car 12v inverter to keep AA & LI’s charged so I’m usually never dead on power. A copy of Photoshop element helps fill out the kit as you need to watch those converging verticals.
Great topic here. I enjoyed the conversation.
Kodak makes good cameras that are idiot proof for the most part. Although the Easy Share software is garbage IMHO.
Drew
Jeff - thanks for sharing this info with us. I've been toying with the idea of a new camera for just the features you've mentioned here, and now it looks like I may have just the right one - all from your post. Many thanks for this post!
Ann
As for me, I still cant part with my Canon Digital Rebel with the 10-20mm lens. (sorry)!!!
Thanks for the recommendation - I have had a number of agents ask recently for suggestions on what to purchase. After reading your review and the other comments, now I have an answer.
I was waiting for Jeff to reposond and will echo that thought. Those reviews are biased and normally are not accurate. I almost didnt buy a CD recorder once and bought it anyway and it's great.
Dont believe the 'fake' hype..
Are the reviews saying this on other sites?? or only on amazon?? Jeff, how is it in low light?.. I'm curious because this may be my next camera.
OK Jeff - on your recommendation I bought it. Does your range of influence ever surprise you or make you go hmmmm. I know whenever someone emails me or comments about how something I suggested worked out for them or touched them in some way - it sure makes me go hmmmm.
The camera should be here in a few days. I'll let you know how I like it. Thanks for your advice.
Joni, I've never used the camera, but I did a quick feature comparison. The main difference is that the KodakC743 does not have an ultra wide angle lens. So, shots of smaller rooms will suffer for sure. Hope that helps a bit.
There is a Kodak V570 and a v705. The only difference is the # of megapixels. You can buy the more expensive one but for Real Estate it isn't needed. Make sure NOT to buy the V610 series, it does NOT HAVE THE SAME WIDE ANGLE (a stager already made this mistake)
I bought 5 of the v570 cameras for all of my agents, they are a MUST have. But damn, Amazon just dropped the price to $150!
$150 on Amazon Kodak Kodak V570
Frank Borges LL0SA- Virginia Broker/ Owner FranklyRealty.com
Blog.FranklyRealty.com Featured in BusinessWeek, CNBC, WSJ etc.
Jeff, received my camera this week. The Amazon price was the lowest. I love the design, sleek. I have a redesign project coming up, I look forward to using the camera for the transformation. The wide angle will capture the look I need.
Thanks, I wouldn't have gotten one so soon and kept the other Kodak but seeing is believing, no regrets.
I too am the proud owner of a Kodak V570. I use it in my staging business and think it's the next best thing to sliced bread... Why, in today's modern world, it took so long for a digital wide angled point&shoot camera to be invented is beyond me. I'm just glad someone came up with the idea.
The only problem I sometimes encounter is 'soap-like bubbles' popping up in my photos. The people at Kodak said it was due to small specks of dust which the flash picks up and the solution was to take the flash off. Needless to say, I often end up with dark photos, which I can usually edit with the software.
Has anyone else experienced this problem? Any solutions?
Thanks Nick for the advice. Will definitely try it.
And Jeff, you can now sleep better at night.... Glad I could be of help!
Joanne, please let us know if it works. :)
Jeff.. you may be able to deduce what i was taking close up pics of.. (from our conversation).
Well, wouldn't you know it. Took many pictures and none of them came out with 'soap bubbles'.
Nick, I did try the 'bandage over the flash' technique and found that the pics came out just as clear and bright. So I'll keep that in mind should those annoying spots come back.
Update I was just one amazon and picked up th V705 with a 1 gig sd card for 230 the V570 has risen in price to I had been looking for a wide angle camera for a bit and it being priced around 200 didn't hurt. I think the original post put it at 299.
I am new to active rain and i am so hooked on it
I've had good and bad experiences with this camera. The wide angle lens and the video capabilities are almost worth it. My main issue with this camera is with the soap bubbles it randomly puts on my pictures. What is so frustrating is that you can't always see them on the display screen. It's only after I've downloaded them to my PC that I notice them. I know I'm not crazy, the other Stager I work with has the same issue with this model. It's gotten to the point that I now bring 2 cameras to big jobs so I know I'll have pictures I can use.
Here's 2 samples of what I'm dealing with. It doesn't happen all the time, and sometimes not even in the same room! I'll trying putting tape over the flash to see if that stops it.
Angel, I know exactly how you feel! I have ruined many of my staging photos with that problem. Please let me know if the 'tape tip' works for you. Good luck!
Joanne
Jeff,
Thank you so much for sharing this information. I liked the pictures you shared and I showed this information to my husband and guess what? He is getting me this camera for my birthday. It has already been ordered and we can't wait to get it. I have a camara I use for real estate now but when I read what you said about this camara and the wide angle, I convenced my husband to get it for my work. He has two other digital cameras but I still like what this Kodak camera can do. Thanks again.
also, does the 'soap bubble' normally happen in lower lighting or other specific circumstances?
Nick, see my post of Feb. 27.
I took about 60 pictures of a staging I did today without the tape over the flash. I just downloaded them and not one of them had the soap bubbles. Keeping my fingers crossed that 'the' problem has gone away somehow.
Tim... no doubt. I had that same camera back in the day! :)
Joanne and Nick, thanks for keeping everyone up to date!
Jeff,Thanks for the post I've been cosidering the V705 or the V610 I'm leaning towards the 610 because of the 10 times optical zoom. I will give up 1 megapixel for that!!
Great Post!! I keep hearing all good stuff about these Kodak cameras my guess is they had to come up with a far greater digital camera at a good price point. Since they did lose a huge 35mm film market share. They are innovative and a smart company.
Good Day!! have a cup of java and a smile on me :)
Duayne -- just remember, the V610 does NOT have the wide angle. The widest angle on the V610 is 38mm. The widest angle on the V705 is 23mm. On the other hand the V610 has the longest zoom at 380mm. The longest that the V705 goes is 117mm.
So the bottom line is, if you want wide angle, go with the V705. If you want long zoom, go with the V610.
Jeff,
I am going to best buy today to buy this camera. Thanks for doing all the research!
Tina, if you can test it out in the store, do so. I love it, but it's always best to check the "feel" for yourself.
Hey Jeff,
I just returned ordered my new" Pink" Kodak v705. I really like black better but the pink was on sale for $229,000. I did go to a Best Buy near me and they were out so I am just trusting your opinion.
Thanks for the input!
Tina
Okay, I did it. I got mine brand new off eBay for $234 (total, with shipping) and it comes with a little case, a mini tripod (which I don't need, have one..oh well) and a 2GB memory card. It is supposed to be here by next Wednesday. I CAN'T WAIT THAT LONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(I love cameras. Love love love them...I have a feeling people in my office are gonna want to borrow mine!)
Jeff,
The Kodak v705 has become quite a hit here on ActiveRain.
I just got the camera, and although I know quite a bit about photography, I am still learning about the specific features of this camera and how to use them.
You do a fantastic job on creating video tutorials. I have just seen your post and video on Wufoo and it was excellent.
I know you are busy, however I know you like to share. You and Frank Llosa are probably the two most knowledgeable members of ActiveRain on the use of the v705.
Maureen Henry, Joelle Green, myself, and others would benefit if you provided some video tutorials on the use of this camera.
Here is a blog asking for v705 tutorials.
Looking for v705 real estate tutorials
Jeff,
Thanks for all the great info on the camera.
I am in the market for a new camera and I appreciate you sharing your experiences with us.
I will have to check the Kodak V705 out.
this page keeps loggin me out.. anyways..
Jeff, initially, my comment was going to be this.. "As much as i would like to take credit for helping that come up in the search engine, your opening paragraph is what did it.. openquote 'the best POINT AND SHOOT camera for the Real Estate Professional' with the bigger keywords in there.. (bolded for emphasis).'
then i searched 'best camera for real estate' and it didn't come up. so, i dont think so much that the sig tag did it, but then my other side of the brain says, hey!! there are no follow tags in this code, so its not the link to your profile.
alas, after the two brains were done debating the point. Jeff, you may be right. AGAIN!! :)
great insight. can i have a piece of that brain? ;) i see you posted one on short tails and long tails. i will check it out later. i'm way behind. i feel like that kid that plugs the dam with one finger, then another, then another.. and it still leaks. well, right now, i'm going to buy some C4 and blow the dam up!!
ps. butterflies!! lalalalala :)
later gator. and yes this is really the cool dude nick. sorry i can't figure out how to login. clues you into wher my head is at right now.. lalala butterfly!!!
EDIT.. whoa.. how am i able to come in and edit. hey is this a sick joke. i'm going to stand in the corner now. bye bye butterfly
That is the other camera I thought about buying. I ended up getting the Canon PowerShot A710 IS.
With the A710 IS you can add a wide angle, telephoto, waterproof casing, and more. So as a working amateur photographer I thought in the end I would get more use out of the PowerShot. Mainly I wanted a pocketable camera with more that 3x zoom. The PowerShot is 6x optical 24x digital.
Oh, btw, did I mention I have a wide angle Nikon D50 SLR for Real Estate or serious shooting.
Therefore, the Kodak is probably the best bet for most every realtor.
Keep Blogging!
Rob... thanks. Be sure to read through all the comments. I know there are a ton of them, but there's a lot of meat in the comments.
Troy... the wide angle is what sold me, and the auto stitching of panoramic shots. Thanks for stopping in.
Great Wide Angle Real Estate shots, a great improvement over our previous Kodak Digital Camera, DX 7590.
We really notice the improvement on real estate shots of small bathrooms, it shows the entire bathroom.
This is a no brainer, get this camera and always take it with you.
I am loving my v705. I used it to take pictures of the listing I put on one of my blogs. I just need to learn how to fix the distortion that comes with the wide angle.
It's easy enough to use, and so compact. It is a LOT of camera for the size
Do any of the V series Kodak cameras come with any type of image stabilization? I was having trouble understanding the Kodak web site.
Brian... I believe they all do. I know this one does have it.
Jeff..btw, i never came back to thank you for this advice. i got the v570 and its great!
my appraisal reports are looking better for both interior and exterior shots... and comps are very easy to shoot from the same side of the street. overall its made my comparable shooting safer! much safer!! (no more shooting from opposite side of street which is against traffic)
i wanted to thank you for the suggestion to buy this camera, Jeff. :)
i wouldn't have bought it otherwise. so much appreciated.
Ok, I figured that 114 replies to this post were not enough...so here I am...and happy to say I took Jeff's advice and just bought my V705 on eBay. I was prepared for what to expect in terms of features, but goodness...I had no idea it would be so small! I'm afraid of losing it! ;)
I'm looking forward to posting some great B&A's shots in the future...thanks for the tip Jeff!
Susan
Susan... HIS photos are the ones we probably really want to see. :)
Maureen... amen to that.
Ha ha ha! Maybe next time (NOT). What happens at the salon, STAYS at the salon! (Although I did make a movie on my V705 while I was there, just to check it out - don't tell the other clients, though!).
Ok, I posted my pics this am. Enjoy!
Susan
Better late then never, right? Thanks for the post and pictures. Do you know anyone that wants to buy a Cannon Powershot SD 500 with a broken screen?? :)
Anyway.....I finally purchased the V705 2 days ago on Ebay. I can't wait to get my hands on this camera. I feel like a kid the night before Christmas!
Angelica... my best advice is to invest in a really good wide angle lens... or spend hundreds and hundreds and hundreds less and buy this little camera.
Bill and Barbara... I hear you. Just for fun, take a look at Susan Smith's comparison photos. http://activerain.com/blogsview/154855/What-a-difference-the
Jeff Jeff Jeff!!!
Ok being in Canada, and searching for weeks for this camera, I GOT MY DELIVERED TODAY! I am completely giddy over it...silly I know. I have a home staged, I am heading there as soon as the battery is charged, and probably going to try some shots at dusk too.
And yes, the booklet it comes with, wow, pretty much nothing is helpful in there (took me 5 mins to figure out the usb cable) But I do have the PDF file saved, thankfully.
Now one question, how do I switch it to wide angle?
Btw, you must be one of the most helpful bloggers on here, I am addicted to your how-to-videos. Good idea for the people who need to see it, to understand it!
You rock!
Heather
Hi Gene, I just spotted that. Bare with me, I am pretty much technology challenged. But thank you none the less!
Heather
C'mon Jeff,
you are going to put me out of business :)
I've been looking for a compact, wide angle camera...... Looks like I found the right one. Thanks!
Jeff I am busting to get this camera. I ordered it on Buy.com and got a GREAT deal, but they were not able to fill the order so I am out and about looking again. To date no one seems to have it.
By the way I just did my free trial Real Estate show for the very first time and I LOVE IT. Just have not been able to download to AR as yet. BUT I have emailed realtors and I am asking if they are interested in using this as part of their marketing plan in 2008. I will let you know how it goes. But I am interested in joining. WHAT A GREAT THING, thanks sooo much
Phyllis Pafumi
I heard this camera was discontinued...
ILW
Discontinued, just my luck... but that does explain why I could'nt find it anywhere other than e-bay. So does anyone know of a similar camera in function, form and price? Is the V570 a good alternative or should I just get it on e-bay while I still can?
Lisa, you can read my blog about the discontinued V705 and possible alternatives. The only camera with a similar lens is the Richo GX100. It has a 24mm lens and the cost is around $550. This camera puts out 10MP photos and has a larger sensor which contributes to its higher price, but the quality should be much better as well.
The next step is a DSLR with a wide angle lens which will run you around $1,000, but again we are talking about even better picture quality.
Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3K Digital Camera after purchacing the V705 and using the crap out if for a year, the joystick went bad and deamed the camera pretty useless since that controls the whoe thing, So.....I just ordered the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3K Digital Camera and i am so excited, i can wait, it does every thing that i need and more... at under $300, wide angle , awesome zoom and all the bells and whistles....
Has anyone tried using those "Wide Angle Magnet Lens" as an alternative to getting another camera? If so what do you think?
Thanks for the suggestions, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-TZ3K Digital Camera looks like a good alternative, does anyone have hands on experience with it?
Oh, I may have found a site other than e-bay that still has a few V705's in stock for only $249. I'll let you know if it works out.
I got it and i love it, it is so clear and precise. small and usefull
defiantly a great camera,
and it has the under water case for all you adventurous people
All... I can tell from the photos in this review of the DMC-TZ3K that it's "wide angle" lens is not going to compare to the Kodak v705.
http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=3065&review=panasonic+lumix+dmc-tz3
When I return from Inman, I'm going to be contacting Kodak to find out the scoop on the v705.
Hi Jeff,
The Kodak V705 was just presented to me for my 45th birthday by my parents. I shot three listing last Saturday for some agents in my office and emailed the RES flyers to some photographer friends. The panorama feature is amazing. I shoot Benson Horse Property in Arizona. I work for Tierra Antigua Realty. You have had a tremendous impact on my career. Hope to see you someday in Arizona.
John Hurbon
Does this posting set a record from the date of the original posting to ........ the last response?
I got so excited about the camera v750 in the begining and almost cried when I got to the end of the postings.
I'll watch and wait for your next recomendation
I believe I may have found my replacement recommendation for the Kodak v705.
http://res.realestateshows.com/panasonic-lumix-fx35-vs-kodak-v705/
Margaret, I linked to a new post two comments above, but here it is again:
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX35 vs Kodal v705
Old post, but the pictures look great. My camera is working well, but it doesn't do the panoramic shots. I was reading about the Lumix as well. Need to upgrade.
Jeff, I will have to look into this. Thanks for posting!
Certainly looks like a good one for agents
hi Jeff OK...... LOL It took me forever to read all these comments until someone mentioned it was an old post
do you feel the same way? I will click on the new link and see what that was all about I gave myself a head ache concentrating on these comments and your response. so....here I go again with the new link. Next time I better check the year of he pos.t.. huh ?
Definately flash on dust - contacted Panasonic and they referred me to page 111 of FX35 User Manual. Took it back - so many indoor photos at children's party ruined totally by this crazy design defect - relates to focal length of lens and extreme wide angle. AVOID FX35. Wait for the FX150 - just out. 27mm rather than 25mm - may be better. Look forward to trying it out.....
Big Difference.
I also have been trying to determine the best camera for a real estate agent. Given the stated criteria, I would have to agree that the FX35 would be the best choice. I've used the LX3 and if you are willing to spend around $500, I think it's as good as it gets in a compact digital camera for real estate agents. The problem is that giving (or recommending) a good camera to a real estate agent would be tantamount to handing a for sale sign to your seller and saying, "Good luck." There's a lot more to selling a house than putting the sign in the yard and there's a lot more to photography than pointing and shooting. If you are not willing to learn at least something about photography, then hire a professional photographer. If you are willing to learn about photography, then the FX35 would be a good camera to get started on. You will soon realized some of the advantages of having the LX3, but it wouldn't take you long to see the huge advantages a DSLR will give you, then there are accessories like a tripod, strobes, reflectors and filters. Wouldn't it be easier and wouldn't you get better results from a pro? Okay, photography has become an obsession with me and I'm willing to go all the way when it comes to equipment and learning techniques, but it takes a lot of time. Just keep that in mind.
Thanks for the tip with the camera. I need to upgrade to a new one hopefully next year.
Jeff, I just discovered the p880. It is supposedly a 24mm. Can that be? Only 1 mm less than the v570 and it has a huge lens (ie sharper)
Also you might like to see this:
VIDEO WIDE ANGLE comparison.
Frank
Hubba...
No response needed. I don't feel like playing in the rain but I do need my quota for the day.
Expect to see me on your blog 10 times :)
TLW...ROAR!
You're killin' me. Looks like something exploded in my email inbox. :)